Chen, X., & Brawner, C. E., & Ohland, M. W., & Orr, M. K. (2013, June), A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices  Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19134

\bibitem{asee_peer_19134}
  Chen, X., \& Brawner, C. E., \& Ohland, M. W., \& Orr, M. K. (2013, June), \emph{A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices}
  Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.
  10.18260/1-2--19134

Xingyu Chen, Catherine E. Brawner, Matthew W. Ohland, and Marisa K. Orr.  "A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices".  2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2013.  https://strategy.asee.org/19134 Internet.  18 May, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_19134}
  Xingyu Chen, Catherine E. Brawner, Matthew W. Ohland, and Marisa K. Orr.
  "A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices".
  \emph{2013 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2013.
  https://strategy.asee.org/19134 Internet.  18 May, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_19134
author = "Xingyu Chen, Catherine E. Brawner, Matthew W. Ohland, and Marisa K. Orr"
title = "A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices"
booktitle = "2013 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2013"
month = "June"
address = "Atlanta, Georgia"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://strategy.asee.org/19134}
number = {10.18260/1-2--19134}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -           Engineering Matriculation Practices: A Benchmarking StudyContribution: Researchers have studied first-year engineering programs in various ways,including multiple surveys, but have yet to develop a taxonomic system for describing howstudents matriculate to a discipline in all engineering colleges. Such a descriptive study is ingreat demand. Institutions seeking to benchmark, improve the method they are using, orimplement a new method will find this a useful reference.Methods: We canvassed all 403 US undergraduate ABET EAC-accredited engineering programsto determine the universe of practices leading to direct contact with a specific engineering major.Data was gathered from university, college, and departmental websites and through telephonecalls to admissions and engineering personnel. In addition, in-depth interviews were conductedwith College of Engineering representatives at the 11 institutions that comprise the MultipleInstitution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD)partnership. These semi-structured interviews determined: 1) who makes the admissions decisionfor engineering students; 2) at what point may students declare an engineering major; 3) theformal mechanism by which students are advised; and 4) support programs that are available forfirst year students.Findings: Our preliminary taxonomy consists of four primary matriculation modes:     Formal First-Year Engineering Program (FYE) – A first year engineering program        “owns” the students until they have met the requirements to matriculate into their        disciplinary major. Ownership includes advising and the teaching of an Introduction to        Engineering sequence.     Direct Matriculation with required General Engineering coursework (DM-GE) –Students        enroll in a specific engineering major when they matriculate and are generally advised        there. Students are required to take an introduction to engineering course or sequence.     Direct Matriculation without required General Engineering coursework (DM-noGE) –        Students enroll in a specific engineering major when they matriculate and are generally        advised there. The first engineering course that students take is in the discipline.     Post-General Education (PGE) – Students complete their general education requirements        before matriculating into an engineering major. Advising is done outside of the College        of Engineering.A hybrid of the two DM modes exists in some programs, where some engineering majors requirean introduction to engineering and others do not. Undecided students at DM institutions may alsoenter engineering without declaring a specific engineering major. We call these students“undesignated engineering” or DMU.From the interviews we learned:    The college influence on admissions ranges from none at all to setting the admissions       standards for engineering students. However, none makes admissions decisions directly.    DM students may declare a major when they enter the institution; if they are undecided,       they may declare one at any time as long as they are in good academic standing.    Students in FYE programs may matriculate into a major upon satisfactory completion of       first year engineering requirements, normally at the end of the second semester.    Undesignated students in most DM programs are advised centrally in engineering.
AU  - Xingyu Chen
AU  - Catherine E. Brawner
AU  - Matthew W. Ohland
AU  - Marisa K. Orr
CY  - Atlanta, Georgia
DA  - 2013/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/19134
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--19134
ER  -