Asee peer logo

Assessment methods and students’ expectations: A Survey

Download Paper |

Conference

ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023

Location

State College,, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

March 30, 2023

Start Date

March 30, 2023

End Date

April 12, 2023

Page Count

7

DOI

10.18260/1-2--45067

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/45067

Download Count

59

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Rajarajan Subramanian Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College

visit author page

Rajarajan Subramanian is currently serving as an Assistant Teaching Professor of Civil Engineering and Construction (SDCET) programs at Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg. Previously, he worked as Transportation Engineer at Maryland State Highway Administration. He has a total of 25 years of teaching experience (Annamalai University, India, Linton Institute of Technology at Ipoh, Malaysia, and Penn State University at Harrisburg U.S.A) plus 10 years of professional engineering experience.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Assessment methods and students’ expectations: A Survey Abstract

Assessments of students’ learning capacity can be done in various ways. Different types of assessments that are available for the instructors serve different purposes. Most instructors use traditional assessments to measure learning. Traditional assessments include examinations, quizzes, essays, and writing reports. Some of these assessments use fewer resources and money to accomplish the gauging of students’ capacity to learn. But the instructor’s feedback on students’ performance and learning progress is not good. Instructors’ feedback on examinations is a very important aspect of learning and therefore the traditional assessments lack constructive criticism of the students from the instructors. Engineering courses need certain types of assessments that ascertain the students’ capability of creative thinking, analytic knowledge, and out-of-the-box ideas. The students are given a questionnaire to give their opinion of what kind of assessment mode they like. Based on the questionnaire responses, it can be concluded that the students do not like to have traditional examinations. Most students hate the examinations because they feel stressed out. Most students like to have classwork assignments and homework assignments rather than examinations. This paper elicits the pros and cons of using class works and home-works for the assessment of student learning. A questionnaire survey was conducted for each of the courses taught in two different semesters. The questionnaire was given to students at the beginning of the course, in the first meeting of the class for each course. The results were analyzed, and the outcome of the survey is to have a minimum number of examinations rather than class work or home-works.

Subramanian, R. (2023, March), Assessment methods and students’ expectations: A Survey Paper presented at ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023, State College,, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--45067

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015