Broemer, E., & Recktenwald, G. (2021, July), Cheating and Chegg: a Retrospective  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--36792

\bibitem{asee_peer_36792}
  Broemer, E., \& Recktenwald, G. (2021, July), \emph{Cheating and Chegg: a Retrospective}
  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.
  10.18260/1-2--36792

Eli Broemer and Geoffrey Recktenwald.  "Cheating and Chegg: a Retrospective".  2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July.  ASEE Conferences, 2021.  https://strategy.asee.org/36792 Internet.  08 Jun, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_36792}
  Eli Broemer and Geoffrey Recktenwald.
  "Cheating and Chegg: a Retrospective".
  \emph{2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2021.
  https://strategy.asee.org/36792 Internet.  08 Jun, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_36792
author = "Eli Broemer and Geoffrey Recktenwald"
title = "Cheating and Chegg: a Retrospective"
booktitle = "2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2021"
month = "July"
address = "Virtual Conference"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://strategy.asee.org/36792}
number = {10.18260/1-2--36792}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - In the spring of 2020, universities across America and the world abruptly transitioned to online learning.  The online transition required faculty to find novel ways to administer assessments and in some cases, for students to utilize novel ways of cheating in their classes. 
The purpose of this paper is to provide a retrospective on cheating during online exams in the spring of 2020.  It specifically looks at honor code violations in a sophomore level engineering course that enrolled more than 200 students.  In this particular course, four pre-COVID assessments were given in class and six post-COVID assessments were given online.  This paper examines the increasing rate of cheated on these assessments and the profiles of the students who were engaged in cheating.  It compares students who were engaged in violations of the honor code as primary violators (uploading exam questions) vs. those who were secondary violators (looking at solutions to uploaded questions).
This paper also looks at the abuse of Chegg during exams and the responsiveness of Chegg’s honor code team.  It discusses the effectiveness of Chegg’s user account data in pursuing academic integrity cases.  Information is also provided on the question response times for Chegg tutors in answering exam questions and the actual efficacy cheating in this fashion.
AU  - Eli Broemer
AU  - Geoffrey Recktenwald
CY  - Virtual Conference
DA  - 2021/07/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Cheating and Chegg: a Retrospective
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/36792
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--36792
ER  -