Examining Shared Understandings of Design Artifacts in Upper-elementary School Engineering

Nicole Alexandra Batrouny; Kristen B. Wendell; Chelsea Joy Andrews; Tejaswini S. Dalvi

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Location: Virtual On line
Publication Date: June 22, 2020
Start Date: June 22, 2020
End Date: June 26, 2021
Conference Session: Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 2
Tagged Division: Pre-College Engineering Education
Page Count: 17
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--34613
Permanent URL: https://strategy.asee.org/34613
Download Count: 384

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Nicole Alexandra Batrouny Tufts University

visit author page

Nicole Batrouny is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Her engineering education research interests include upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and engineering, collaboration in engineering, and decision making in engineering. For her Master's thesis, she uncovered talk moves used by 4th grade students that fostered collaborative, disciplinary decision-making during an engineering design outreach program. For her dissertation, she intends to explore the ways in which team mental models function in teams of novice engineers and how novice engineers can be trained to collaborate more effectively on diverse teams.

visit author page

biography

Kristen B. Wendell Tufts University

visit author page

Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college-level engineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school experience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen-bethke-wendell

visit author page

biography

Chelsea Joy Andrews Tufts University orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-595X

visit author page

Chelsea Andrews is a post-doctoral researcher at Tufts University and University of Massachusetts-Boston in engineering education. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering, an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmental engineering, and a PhD from Tufts University in Engineering Education. Her current research includes investigating children's engagement in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis.

visit author page

author page

Tejaswini S. Dalvi University of Massachusetts, Boston

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

With the implementation of the Framework for K12 Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards in the United States, engineering is increasingly prevalent in the pre-college classroom. A typical way to incorporate engineering into K12 education is through collaborative engineering design projects. This type of project typically requires students to present the group’s design work in a single representation, often a co-constructed physical object. This physical object is not perfectly representative of the group’s more abstract “design,” or their mental concept of their engineering solution. Though we expect that the physical artifact which a group creates is representative of a shared understanding among the group, from studies of engineering design with adults, we know that coming to this shared understanding of the problem, the team strategy, and the design artifact itself requires intense negotiation. Designers must communicate across all members of a team in order to establish roles and relationships, plan and change activities, gather and share information, generate and adopt concepts, and avoid and resolve conflict. Studies of elementary engineering education illustrate the ways in which young children manage these elements of designing together. However, questions remain around the issue of shared understanding. For instance, Is it necessary to come to a shared understanding to create a design artifact? What does the design artifact of a group without a shared understanding look like? How does it come to be?

In this study, we seek to describe cases from two classrooms where groups had different degrees of shared understanding of both the design process and artifact. In the third-grade classroom, students learned about animal habitats and survival to inform their solution to the problem of displaced animals in their local community due to habitat destruction from human developments. In the fourth-grade classroom, students informed their design of a roadside barrier to protect migratory birds from noise and light pollution on highways with an inquiry into the physics of light and sound and the structure and function of birds’ ears and eyes. Data sources for this descriptive study include video records of whole-class and team discourse, interviews with individual students, notebooks and other written artifacts, and photos of design constructions. We employ qualitative case study and microethnographic analysis techniques to explore the differing conceptions of the design artifacts.

In the third-grade focus group, there is near perfect agreement among team members about how the artifact came to be, whose ideas it comprises, and what each physical component represents. In the fourth-grade focus group, there is conflict and confusion about their artifact; students among the same group describe the functionality and evolution of their prototype differently. We also begin to examine the ways in which the introduction and implementation of the different design challenges may have influenced the cohesion of the groups’ design conceptualization. This work begins to unravel an implicit assumption that researchers and instructors may have about collaborative engineering work: that all members of a group have the same understanding of their design concept.

Citation
Format

Batrouny, N. A., & Wendell, K. B., & Andrews, C. J., & Dalvi, T. S. (2020, June), Examining Shared Understandings of Design Artifacts in Upper-elementary School Engineering Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--34613

TY - CPAPER
AB - With the implementation of the Framework for K12 Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards in the United States, engineering is increasingly prevalent in the pre-college classroom. A typical way to incorporate engineering into K12 education is through collaborative engineering design projects. This type of project typically requires students to present the group’s design work in a single representation, often a co-constructed physical object. This physical object is not perfectly representative of the group’s more abstract “design,” or their mental concept of their engineering solution. Though we expect that the physical artifact which a group creates is representative of a shared understanding among the group, from studies of engineering design with adults, we know that coming to this shared understanding of the problem, the team strategy, and the design artifact itself requires intense negotiation. Designers must communicate across all members of a team in order to establish roles and relationships, plan and change activities, gather and share information, generate and adopt concepts, and avoid and resolve conflict. Studies of elementary engineering education illustrate the ways in which young children manage these elements of designing together. However, questions remain around the issue of shared understanding. For instance, Is it necessary to come to a shared understanding to create a design artifact? What does the design artifact of a group without a shared understanding look like? How does it come to be?

In this study, we seek to describe cases from two classrooms where groups had different degrees of shared understanding of both the design process and artifact. In the third-grade classroom, students learned about animal habitats and survival to inform their solution to the problem of displaced animals in their local community due to habitat destruction from human developments. In the fourth-grade classroom, students informed their design of a roadside barrier to protect migratory birds from noise and light pollution on highways with an inquiry into the physics of light and sound and the structure and function of birds’ ears and eyes. Data sources for this descriptive study include video records of whole-class and team discourse, interviews with individual students, notebooks and other written artifacts, and photos of design constructions. We employ qualitative case study and microethnographic analysis techniques to explore the differing conceptions of the design artifacts.

In the third-grade focus group, there is near perfect agreement among team members about how the artifact came to be, whose ideas it comprises, and what each physical component represents. In the fourth-grade focus group, there is conflict and confusion about their artifact; students among the same group describe the functionality and evolution of their prototype differently. We also begin to examine the ways in which the introduction and implementation of the different design challenges may have influenced the cohesion of the groups’ design conceptualization. This work begins to unravel an implicit assumption that researchers and instructors may have about collaborative engineering work: that all members of a group have the same understanding of their design concept.

AU - Nicole Alexandra Batrouny
AU - Kristen B. Wendell
AU - Chelsea Joy Andrews
AU - Tejaswini S. Dalvi
CY - Virtual On line
DA - 2020/06/22
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Examining Shared Understandings of Design Artifacts in Upper-elementary School Engineering
UR - https://strategy.asee.org/34613
DO - 10.18260/1-2--34613
ER -