Asee peer logo

Investigating Engineering Laboratory Course Assignments and Assessments across Four Institutions and a Case Study on Their Impact on Students’ Lab Report Writing

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS) Technical Session 5: Lab Design

Tagged Division

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

Page Count

17

DOI

10.18260/1-2--43869

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/43869

Download Count

113

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Dave Kim Washington State University-Vancouver

visit author page

Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In particular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M in research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with the manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for marine and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with a focus on fatigue strength improvement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 180 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.

visit author page

biography

John D Lynch

visit author page

John D. Lynch received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Cum Laude, from the University of Utah in Salt Lake City in 1979. From 1979 to 1995 he worked in the high-tech industry in California and Oregon as a computer engineer, including positions at Floati

visit author page

author page

Artem Taran

biography

Anna Yurov

visit author page

Lead Summer Research Assistant. Mechanical Engineering Student

visit author page

author page

Ryder Sandry

Download Paper |

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate how engineering lab courses intervene with students in terms of written course materials. The instruments used for the study include Feisel and Rosa’s philosophical-based lab learning objectives and engineering lab report writing outcomes (1 through 9). The participating lab courses include seven engineering lab courses across four institutions. The laboratory courses cover the majority of Feisel and Rosa’s learning objectives for lab assignments. The most typical assignment method is to provide lab report guidelines in individual lab assignments or for the entire lab course; however, some labs offer templates with blanks, so students simply fill those in for lab reports. We mapped lab assignments and assessments with the engineering lab report writing outcomes. Most labs focus on audience expectations, experimentation processes, high-quality tables/graphs, lab data analysis, and organization. After surveying all the lab courses, we conducted a case study to investigate how lab instructors’ lab report assignments affect students’ lab report quality in the two lab courses (EE 221 with n = 12 and CE 212 with n = 12), showing distinct characteristics in their lab assignment and assessment. The student sample average scores from EE221, which did not provide any guidelines but required fill-in-the-blanks type lab reports, range from 1.6 (outcome 6) to 1.8 (outcome 9). Note that none of the outcomes reach a satisfactory level. In contrast, CE 212 provided the instructor’s expectations for the labs and lab reports explicitly through handouts and guidelines. CE 212 student samples show that most outcomes reach the satisfactory level or 2 out of 3. It is concluded that engineering lab courses offered a variety of materials with a wide range of lab objectives and outcomes. Those materials could impact the students’ lab report writing extensively.

Kim, D., & Lynch, J. D., & Taran, A., & Yurov, A., & Sandry, R. (2023, June), Investigating Engineering Laboratory Course Assignments and Assessments across Four Institutions and a Case Study on Their Impact on Students’ Lab Report Writing Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43869

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015