Asee peer logo

Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Development from Perspectives of Undergraduate Students: ME Senior Exit Survey

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 South East Section Meeting

Location

Marietta, Georgia

Publication Date

March 10, 2024

Start Date

March 10, 2024

End Date

March 12, 2024

Page Count

16

DOI

10.18260/1-2--45543

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/45543

Download Count

18

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Gang Liu University of Pittsburgh at Bradford Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-4689

visit author page

Dr. Gang Liu is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology in the Division of Physical and Computational Sciences, at the University of Pittsburgh at Bradford. He received his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering in 2006 and another Ph.D. degree in engineering education in 2018. He teaches mechanical engineering undergraduate courses, including statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, etc. His research interests include in-class intervention, misconceptions, curriculum development, first-year experience, novices and experts, and metacognition.
Address:
242 Duke Engineering Building
Division of Physical and Computational Sciences
University of Pittsburgh at Bradford
Bradford, PA 16701
Office Phone: 814-362-7571
Email: gliu@pitt.edu

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Most of the modern educational institutes adopted standard-based curriculum development, which means that the educators set standards or bars for the students to reach. Generally, tests or examinations were used to assess the student’s mastery of the specific knowledge and skills. The initiative of curriculum development is from the perspectives of instructors and policymakers. In recent decades, the needs of the real world shifted quickly and became more and more diverse. For example, the existing mechanical engineering curriculum was challenged by real-life industrial needs. Universities must reform their curriculum development according to the new challenges and requirements from different perspectives, including the student’s perspectives. One of the feedback forms from the students is the senior undergraduate student survey, which shows the strengths and weaknesses of the current curriculum in their eyes. Students with different career plans and socioeconomic backgrounds could have various learning requirements and perceptions. The standard-based curriculum does not always match their needs. The author of the present paper has taught undergraduate students from freshmen to senior students and collected the senior exit survey results for two consecutive semesters from a public university. The senior exit survey indicated different views from those of faculty members. Providing a personalized curriculum to individual students could boost their motivation and desire to achieve their career goals. By doing that, we can provide students with a solid and rewarding foundation for academic and personal success and increase retention rates.

Liu, G. (2024, March), Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Development from Perspectives of Undergraduate Students: ME Senior Exit Survey Paper presented at 2024 South East Section Meeting, Marietta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--45543

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015