Asee peer logo

Project Delivery Techniques For Historic Structures: A Case Study

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Trends in Constr. Engr. Educ. I

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

7.950.1 - 7.950.11

DOI

10.18260/1-2--10769

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/10769

Download Count

387

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Sonya Cooper

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu

Session # 1421

A Project Delivery Technique for Historic Structures: A Case Study

Sonya L. Cooper New Mexico State University

Abstract

As managers and superintendents utilize improved delivery systems, successful construction projects are increasingly delivered ahead of schedule and under budget. Historic preservation differs from new construction in that it utilizes several prescriptions for arresting deterioration while retaining original materials and workmanship. Preservation techniques used in tandem within a single project may include protection, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. Primavera Project PlannerÒ is used to plan and manage the adobe Socorro Mission Preservation Project currently underway in Socorro, Texas. Constructed in 1843, this remarkable National Register of Historic Places site exhibits Native American, Spanish Colonial, and European influences. The introduction of cement-based products in the mid 1920s hastened structural deterioration through moisture entrapment. The return to traditional materials and techniques, including on-site brick making, and the application of lime plastering, presents unique scheduling and training challenges. This paper details the benefits of using Primavera Project PlannerÒ as a powerful project delivery tool for this historic structure, including the additional advantages it serves in the arenas of public education and grant solicitation.

Introduction

Project delivery systems in the form of software have become necessary tools in the construction industry. These tools vary in ability and complexity, and their use varies widely with companies and managerial methods. In general, without a project delivery tool, the project coordinator manages in a reactive mode verses a proactive mode. There is simply no time to forecast the future. Some projects still succeed today based on this method; however, it can be strongly argued that project delivery tools have succeeded in bringing projects to completion under budget, and within the preliminary schedule, well ahead of margins allowed by traditional methods of managing.

General Contractors and their project managers have become very knowledgeable about materials and methods used in their construction specialties. The exercise of loading information into a software program becomes just that, an exercise. The task is not that simple for preservation projects. In the area of historic preservation, typical ‘for profit’ general contractors Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education

Main Menu

Cooper, S. (2002, June), Project Delivery Techniques For Historic Structures: A Case Study Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10769

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015