Asee peer logo

Understanding Reflection Activities Broadly

Download Paper |

Conference

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Columbus, Ohio

Publication Date

June 24, 2017

Start Date

June 24, 2017

End Date

June 28, 2017

Conference Session

Encouraging Students to Think Critically

Tagged Division

New Engineering Educators

Page Count

21

DOI

10.18260/1-2--29054

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/29054

Download Count

694

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Jennifer A. Turns University of Washington

visit author page

Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. She is interested in all aspects of engineering education, including how to support engineering students in reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teaching decisions, and the application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineering education.

visit author page

author page

Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer University of Washington Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-749X

author page

Terri L. Lovins University of Washington

biography

Cynthia J. Atman University of Washington

visit author page

Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. Her research focuses on engineering design learning, considering context in engineering design, and the use of reflection to support learning.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Making informed decisions among potential reflection activities can be challenging for engineering educators. Information about the \knowledge gains resulting from different reflection activities would be valuable for engineering educators seeking to make informed choices. In the first part of the work described here, we describe a conceptual framework that summarizes types of knowledge gains resulting from engagement in reflection activities. In the second part of the work, we report on data from students who had engaged in reflection activities.

Turns, J. A., & Shroyer, K. E., & Lovins, T. L., & Atman, C. J. (2017, June), Understanding Reflection Activities Broadly Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--29054

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015