Work in Progress: Using CATME in Team Development of One-Semester-Long Open-Ended First-Year Engineering Student Design Projects

Rui Li; Jack Bringardner

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Location: East Lansing, Michigan
Publication Date: July 31, 2022
Start Date: July 31, 2022
End Date: August 2, 2022
Conference Session: Technical Session M1
Tagged Topic: Works In Progress
Page Count: 5
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--42262
Permanent URL: https://strategy.asee.org/42262
Download Count: 151

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Rui Li New York University

visit author page

Dr. Li earned his master’s degree in Chemical Engineering in 2009 from the Imperial College of London and his doctoral degree in 2020 from the University of Georgia’s College of Engineering, where his research involved using smartphones, wireless sensors, and 3D printing to create low-cost MRI/CT compatible surgical devices. His current research interests are project-based learning, student motivation and educational robotics.

visit author page

biography

Jack Bringardner New York University Tandon School of Engineering orcid.org/0000-0002-5980-384X

visit author page

Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineering Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based curriculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engineering Experience Conference. He is affiliated with the Transportation Engineering program in the NYU Civil and Urban Engineering Department. He is the advisor for NYU student chapter of the Institute for Transportation Engineers.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Teamwork skills are widely regarded as one of the most important and transferrable skills in both academic and professional environments. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) learning outcomes for teamwork include “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences” and “an ability to function effectively on a team” (ABET 2020). These criteria are intrinsically linked to the idea of multidisciplinary collaboration. Being able to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams is a highly sought-after professional skill for engineers. In engineering education, studies have shown that the integration of collaborative work into course content can enhance project-based learning outcomes by developing effective teamwork and communication skills.

Within engineering design education, it is essential to help students develop effective teamwork skills and critical engineering design abilities, such as innovation and open-mindedness. However, it can be challenging for instructors to precisely assess an individual contribution to the completion of team goals. Peer feedback allows the participants to develop and improve their teamwork skills via giving feedback on team members’ competencies and receiving feedback on one’s own competencies. These competencies include contribution, interaction, project, and time management, as well as task-specific skillsets. One advantage of using peer feedback is that it captures interactions when an instructor is not present. Therefore, they could provide additional support for assessing individuals on a team. The goal of this study is to apply more quantitative peer evaluation to help students establish and be aware of healthy team dynamics at the storming stage. Past literature shows a web-based tool, CATME (Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness), could reduce team conflicts and help assess individual contributions to a team.

In the context of an open-ended project in a large private institute, each project lasts for one semester. Three hundred first-year students participate in this group activity with a team formation of two to four members. The primary objective of the project is to build a functional prototype that can solve a real-world problem. Some of the past examples were prosthetic arms, smart water bottles, or self-watering flowerpots. The team will meet regularly and present their progress four times throughout the semester. Each team was assigned a mentor to provide guidance on the technical design of their prototype. Currently, class instructors track team performance using Google Forms with a single peer rating of 15 and comments. In contrast, CATME peer evaluation uses five dimensions of teamwork of CIKEH: Contributing to the team’s work: Interacting with teammates; Keeping the team on track; Expecting quality work; Having relevant knowledge skills, and abilities.

The current team development fits the description of the four-stage model developed by Bruce Tuckman: forming, storming, norming, and performing stages. It is common for the storming stage to lead to more conflicts within the team as the team members start interacting more and more. Competing for leadership and inter-personal conflicts become the major scenes. This study aims to use CATME to improve team development. The research question is: can CATME helps to mitigate conflicts and identify leadership in a multidisciplinary team environment?

To answer the research question, CATME will be used to help with team development in a class of 13 students for a test run. The students will be split up into five groups, two experimental groups are using CATME peer evaluation, another two experimental groups are using conventional Google survey form, and the last group does not use any peer-evaluation software. Moreover, an end-of-semester survey will be used to learn about students’ experience in CATME. The future plan is to implement CATME in cross-school Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) and senior design projects.

Citation
Format

Li, R., & Bringardner, J. (2022, July), Work in Progress: Using CATME in Team Development of One-Semester-Long Open-Ended First-Year Engineering Student Design Projects Paper presented at 2022 First-Year Engineering Experience, East Lansing, Michigan. 10.18260/1-2--42262

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Teamwork skills are widely regarded as one of the most important and transferrable skills in both academic and professional environments. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) learning outcomes for teamwork include “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences” and “an ability to function effectively on a team” (ABET 2020). These criteria are intrinsically linked to the idea of multidisciplinary collaboration. Being able to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams is a highly sought-after professional skill for engineers. In engineering education, studies have shown that the integration of collaborative work into course content can enhance project-based learning outcomes by developing effective teamwork and communication skills. 

Within engineering design education, it is essential to help students develop effective teamwork skills and critical engineering design abilities, such as innovation and open-mindedness. However, it can be challenging for instructors to precisely assess an individual contribution to the completion of team goals. Peer feedback allows the participants to develop and improve their teamwork skills via giving feedback on team members’ competencies and receiving feedback on one’s own competencies. These competencies include contribution, interaction, project, and time management, as well as task-specific skillsets. One advantage of using peer feedback is that it captures interactions when an instructor is not present. Therefore, they could provide additional support for assessing individuals on a team. The goal of this study is to apply more quantitative peer evaluation to help students establish and be aware of healthy team dynamics at the storming stage. Past literature shows a web-based tool, CATME (Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness), could reduce team conflicts and help assess individual contributions to a team.

In the context of an open-ended project in a large private institute, each project lasts for one semester. Three hundred first-year students participate in this group activity with a team formation of two to four members. The primary objective of the project is to build a functional prototype that can solve a real-world problem. Some of the past examples were prosthetic arms, smart water bottles, or self-watering flowerpots. The team will meet regularly and present their progress four times throughout the semester. Each team was assigned a mentor to provide guidance on the technical design of their prototype. Currently, class instructors track team performance using Google Forms with a single peer rating of 15 and comments. In contrast, CATME peer evaluation uses five dimensions of teamwork of CIKEH: Contributing to the team’s work: Interacting with teammates; Keeping the team on track; Expecting quality work; Having relevant knowledge skills, and abilities. 

The current team development fits the description of the four-stage model developed by Bruce Tuckman: forming, storming, norming, and performing stages. It is common for the storming stage to lead to more conflicts within the team as the team members start interacting more and more. Competing for leadership and inter-personal conflicts become the major scenes. This study aims to use CATME to improve team development. The research question is: can CATME helps to mitigate conflicts and identify leadership in a multidisciplinary team environment? 

To answer the research question, CATME will be used to help with team development in a class of 13 students for a test run. The students will be split up into five groups, two experimental groups are using CATME peer evaluation, another two experimental groups are using conventional Google survey form, and the last group does not use any peer-evaluation software. Moreover, an end-of-semester survey will be used to learn about students’ experience in CATME. The future plan is to implement CATME in cross-school Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) and senior design projects. 



AU  - Rui Li
AU  - Jack Bringardner
CY  - East Lansing, Michigan
DA  - 2022/07/31
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Work in Progress: Using CATME in Team Development of One-Semester-Long Open-Ended First-Year Engineering Student Design Projects
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/42262
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--42262
ER  -