Selby, M. A. (2015, June), Assessing Engineering Ethics Training  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23579

\bibitem{asee_peer_23579}
  Selby, M. A. (2015, June), \emph{Assessing Engineering Ethics Training}
  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington.
  10.18260/p.23579

Melodie A. Selby PE.  "Assessing Engineering Ethics Training".  2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2015.  https://strategy.asee.org/23579 Internet.  28 Jul, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_23579}
  Melodie A. Selby PE.
  "Assessing Engineering Ethics Training".
  \emph{2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2015.
  https://strategy.asee.org/23579 Internet.  28 Jul, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_23579
author = "Melodie A. Selby PE"
title = "Assessing Engineering Ethics Training"
booktitle = "2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2015"
month = "June"
address = "Seattle, Washington"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://strategy.asee.org/23579}
number = {10.18260/p.23579}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -                         Assessing Engineering Ethics Tr ainingTeaching and assessing ABET criterion 3f: "an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility" has been a challenge for colleges and universities.This paper reports the initial phase of assessing the engineering ethics training at a faith-baseduniversity, which uses a comprehensive approach to teaching engineering ethics.This study is designed as a first phase to study the effectiveness of teaching engineering ethics atthe university. Later areas of study will build on this study and may include a longitudinal studyand expansion to other institutions.This study is a non-experimental between-subjects non-equivalent groups design. This study isdesigned to compare the moral judgment of engineering students who are just beginning theirstudies at the University with those who are completing their studies.Borenstein et al. (2010) have developed an Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT) to serveas a discipline-specific assessment. This ESIT was used for this study and the results shared withBorenstein et al to add to the database to assess validity.The sample size of this study was not large enough to assess the validity of the test on its own.However, differences between the two groups can be compared to assess the differences in thegroups. The P scores and N2 scores of the ESIT exam of the two classes were compared using atwo-sample t-test to determine if there are differences in the two groups.Note: Data analysis is expected to be complete by mid-December. At that point, the abstract andpaper will be updated to include the results.                                          Refer encesBorenstein, J., Drake, M. J., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. L. (2010). The Engineering and Science     Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Science &     Engineering Ethics, 16, 387-407. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z
AU  - Melodie A. Selby PE
CY  - Seattle, Washington
DA  - 2015/06/14
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Assessing Engineering Ethics Training
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/23579
DO  - 10.18260/p.23579
ER  -