Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students and Professionals With Disabilities

Erin A. Cech

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Location: Virtual Conference
Publication Date: July 26, 2021
Start Date: July 26, 2021
End Date: July 19, 2022
Conference Session: 'Diversity' and Inclusion? Pedagogy, Experiences, Language and Performative Action
Tagged Division: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 16
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--37080
Permanent URL: https://strategy.asee.org/37080
Download Count: 511

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Erin A. Cech University of Michigan

visit author page

Dr. Erin Cech is an associate professor of sociology and mechanical engineering (by courtesy) at the University of Michigan. Before coming to Michigan in 2016, she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University and was on faculty at Rice University. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology in 2011 from UC San Diego and undergraduate degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State University. Cech's research examines cultural mechanisms of inequality reproduction--especially through seemingly innocuous cultural beliefs and practices. Her research has appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science Advances, the American Journal of Sociology, and the American Sociological Review. Her research has been covered by The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, Time, Harvard Business Review, and the news sections of Science and Nature. In 2020, she was named one of Business Equality Magazine’s “40 LGBTQ+ Leaders Under 40.” Website: https://erinacech.com

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Compared to other axes of difference, the experiences of persons with disabilities is often excluded from dialog about diversity and inclusion in engineering education and engineering employment. Recent scholars have suggested that engineering fields may be particularly marginalizing for persons with disabilities. Disability status is often culturally associated with negative stereotypes about intellectual ability, where persons with disabilities are often perceived as less professionally competent than their peers. This association is further compounded by the fact that engineering culture often silences discussions of bodily ability when evaluating performance. However, systematic accounts of the challenges faced by persons with disabilities in school and the workforce are often missing. Using two large survey datasets, I examine the experiences of engineering student and engineering professionals with physical and/or mental disabilities, compared to the experiences of their peers who do not report disabilities. The first data source, the ASEE Diversity and Inclusion Survey, includes data from over 1700 students enrolled in eight engineering programs in the US. The second data source, the STEM Inclusion Study survey, includes data from over 8,000 professional engineers employed in the US. Consistent with national-level estimates in STEM, 13% of engineering students report a physical disability, 3% report a chronic illness, and 9% report mental health issues. Among engineering professionals, 7% report a physical disability, 7% report a chronic illness, and 4% report mental health difficulties. Consistent with hypotheses, I find that both engineering students and engineering professionals with physical and mental disabilities are more likely than their peers to report social marginalization from their classmates and colleagues and devaluation of their professional capabilities at school and work. Engineering students with disabilities are more likely to intend to leave their engineering programs, and engineering professionals with disabilities are more likely to have thought about leaving their job in the last year compared to their peers. These findings suggest systemic biases faced by persons with disabilities in engineering. I join the call for greater attention to the cultural and structural barriers to full participation evidenced by this and other research.

Citation
Format

Cech, E. A. (2021, July), Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students and Professionals With Disabilities Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--37080

TY - CPAPER
AB - Compared to other axes of difference, the experiences of persons with disabilities is often excluded from dialog about diversity and inclusion in engineering education and engineering employment. Recent scholars have suggested that engineering fields may be particularly marginalizing for persons with disabilities. Disability status is often culturally associated with negative stereotypes about intellectual ability, where persons with disabilities are often perceived as less professionally competent than their peers. This association is further compounded by the fact that engineering culture often silences discussions of bodily ability when evaluating performance. However, systematic accounts of the challenges faced by persons with disabilities in school and the workforce are often missing. Using two large survey datasets, I examine the experiences of engineering student and engineering professionals with physical and/or mental disabilities, compared to the experiences of their peers who do not report disabilities. The first data source, the ASEE Diversity and Inclusion Survey, includes data from over 1700 students enrolled in eight engineering programs in the US. The second data source, the STEM Inclusion Study survey, includes data from over 8,000 professional engineers employed in the US. Consistent with national-level estimates in STEM, 13% of engineering students report a physical disability, 3% report a chronic illness, and 9% report mental health issues. Among engineering professionals, 7% report a physical disability, 7% report a chronic illness, and 4% report mental health difficulties. Consistent with hypotheses, I find that both engineering students and engineering professionals with physical and mental disabilities are more likely than their peers to report social marginalization from their classmates and colleagues and devaluation of their professional capabilities at school and work. Engineering students with disabilities are more likely to intend to leave their engineering programs, and engineering professionals with disabilities are more likely to have thought about leaving their job in the last year compared to their peers. These findings suggest systemic biases faced by persons with disabilities in engineering. I join the call for greater attention to the cultural and structural barriers to full participation evidenced by this and other research.
AU - Erin A. Cech
CY - Virtual Conference
DA - 2021/07/26
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students and Professionals With Disabilities
UR - https://strategy.asee.org/37080
DO - 10.18260/1-2--37080
ER -