Lutz, B. D., & Barlow, A. J., & Brown, S. A., & Sanchez, D. (2018, June), Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures?  Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30489

\bibitem{asee_peer_30489}
  Lutz, B. D., \& Barlow, A. J., \& Brown, S. A., \& Sanchez, D. (2018, June), \emph{Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures?}
  Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah.
  10.18260/1-2--30489

Benjamin David Lutz, Allyson Jo Barlow, Shane A. Brown P.E., and Dominga Sanchez.  "Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures?".  2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2018.  https://strategy.asee.org/30489 Internet.  03 Jul, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_30489}
  Benjamin David Lutz, Allyson Jo Barlow, Shane A. Brown P.E., and Dominga Sanchez.
  "Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures?".
  \emph{2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2018.
  https://strategy.asee.org/30489 Internet.  03 Jul, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_30489
author = "Benjamin David Lutz, Allyson Jo Barlow, Shane A. Brown P.E., and Dominga Sanchez"
title = "Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures?"
booktitle = "2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2018"
month = "June"
address = "Salt Lake City, Utah"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://strategy.asee.org/30489}
number = {10.18260/1-2--30489}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - In this research paper, Faculty evaluation of teaching is ubiquitous across engineering education, and the results of those evaluations play critical roles in institutional decision making. And while numerous studies have explored faculty perceptions of existing measures, relatively less work has asked faculty about what kinds of additional data or information might improve their teaching. To address this gap, we asked engineering 20 faculty members across eight engineering departments what they perceived to be missing from current evaluation practices and measurements. Inductive coding approaches revealed three major areas in which additional information would help improve their teaching. Faculty noted 1) the importance of soliciting additional student feedback beyond traditional student evaluations at the end of the semester; 2) the need for more data regarding student retention and transfer of concepts learning in class; and 3) the potential for soliciting additional peer feedback from colleagues and educational researchers. At the same time, some faculty were satisfied with current approaches to teaching evaluation and did not perceive anything to be missing. Findings point to the opportunity to collect more in-depth, qualitative feedback regarding faculty teaching effectiveness. In particular, expert consultation and creating more spaces to solicit written comments from students might help faculty obtain evaluation data that can both aid in both institutional and pedagogical decision making.
AU  - Benjamin David Lutz
AU  - Allyson Jo Barlow
AU  - Shane A. Brown P.E.
AU  - Dominga Sanchez
CY  - Salt Lake City, Utah
DA  - 2018/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures?
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/30489
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--30489
ER  -