Asee peer logo

Free-Body Diagram Performance with Problem Depictions at Different Levels of Abstraction

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Miscellaneous Mechanics: Covid and Free Body Diagrams

Tagged Division

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

Page Count

22

DOI

10.18260/1-2--44646

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/44646

Download Count

17

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Andrew R. Sloboda Bucknell University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-3278

visit author page

Andrew Sloboda is an Assistant Professor at Bucknell University where he teaches a variety of mechanics-based courses, including statics, solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, dynamics, system dynamics, and vibration. His research interests lie primarily in the fields of nonlinear dynamics and vibration.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Students often practice drawing free body diagrams (FBDs) for abstract, text-book style problems where extraneous details in the problem description and accompanying figures have been removed. Since practicing engineers often need to draw FBDs in more realistic contexts, an important question is: can students draw FBDs as well when faced with a less abstract problem representation? Anecdotal information collected by several instructors suggest that decreased levels of abstraction in problem depiction (i.e., greater realism) lead to decreased student performance.

To explore this question, students were asked to draw FBDs for problems with figures at different levels of abstraction: high abstraction (geometric shapes only), medium abstraction (line drawings of objects - like most textbook problems), and low abstraction (photographs of objects). Students in a first-year course, who had just learned to draw FBDs, and students in a third-year course, who were experienced with FBDs, were surveyed. As hypothesized, student performance decreased with decreased abstraction (i.e., greater realism), but this was only the case for first-year students. These results suggest that care should be taken in choosing the level of abstraction for problem representations used for FBD instruction. Students just learning to draw FBDs may be helped by highly abstract problem representations so that these problems are easier. But having more experienced students wrestle with less abstract scenarios when drawing FBDs may help them prepare to draw FBDs in the real world. The detailed results also suggest that instruction focused on helping students to isolate bodies in more realistic or hands-on environments may be warranted for all students of mechanics.

Sloboda, A. R. (2023, June), Free-Body Diagram Performance with Problem Depictions at Different Levels of Abstraction Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44646

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015