Kaw, A. (2021, July), On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting.  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--37534

\bibitem{asee_peer_37534}
  Kaw, A. (2021, July), \emph{On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting.}
  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.
  10.18260/1-2--37534

Autar Kaw.  "On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting.".  2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July.  ASEE Conferences, 2021.  https://peer.asee.org/37534 Internet.  16 May, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_37534}
  Autar Kaw.
  "On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting.".
  \emph{2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2021.
  https://peer.asee.org/37534 Internet.  16 May, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_37534
author = "Autar Kaw"
title = "On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting."
booktitle = "2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2021"
month = "July"
address = "Virtual Conference"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/37534}
number = {10.18260/1-2--37534}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Starting in March 2020, the COVID19 pandemic instantly affected the education of 14 million higher education students in the USA. The switch to remote instruction caught instructors and students off guard – teachers had to change their techniques, approaches, and course content rapidly (called “panicgogy”), and students had to adjust to remote instruction in a hurry.  
Hoping that the pandemic would not last too long, most had expected to return to the regular class format at most by the Fall semester.  That expectation was quickly squashed as the summer semester progressed. If one were teaching a face-to-face classroom in a flipped modality, it would be even more challenging to teach a flipped class in an online environment.
In this paper, we present how the instructor overhauled a face-to-face flipped class in Numerical Methods to an online environment.  This involved 
1)	rethinking the learning design of the course content via the learning management system, 
2)	using Microsoft forms as personal response systems, and YouTube for video lectures, 
3)	not only using break-out rooms for peer-to-peer learning but the “main room” for individual learning as well, 
4)	exploit the availability of two computers and multiple monitors to deliver and observe the synchronous part of the class, 
5)	use of discussion boards to streamline the flow of communication that would have otherwise been unwieldy for the instructor, TAs, and students alike, 
6)	changes made to assessment as it had to be carried online and within a proctoring software environment,
7)	changes in the conducting of office hours.
The above items will be discussed in the paper, and comparisons of face-to-face and online implementations will be made.  The ultimate goal is to present a logic model for a typical lecture-based online flipped STEM classroom for efficient and effective implementation by other instructors.

AU  - Autar Kaw
CY  - Virtual Conference
DA  - 2021/07/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - On Moving a Face-to-Face Flipped Classroom to a Remote Setting.
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/37534
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--37534
ER  -