Morgantown, West Virginia
March 24, 2023
March 24, 2023
March 25, 2023
Diversity
9
10.18260/1-2--44909
https://peer.asee.org/44909
156
Sudipta Chowdhury is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering in Marshall University. His area of research includes Critical Infrastructure Resilience, Disaster Restoration Planning, Supply Chain and Logistics, and formal and informal STEM Education. He has published over 20 peer-reviewed journal articles and multiple conference proceedings. He serves as a reviewer of multiple journals such as OR spectrum, Computers and Operations Research, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Sustainable Cities and Society, Applied Soft Computing, Mathematics, and IEEE systems.
Dr. Alzarrad is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Marshall University. He graduated with dual bachelor’s degrees in Civil Engineering and Business Administration from the University of South Alabama. He received his M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Alabama. Before assuming his current position, he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction at Bradley University. Prior to joining academia, Dr. Alzarrad was a Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) manager at an engineering design firm in Chicago, where he managed multi-million projects (i.e., Wrigley Field restoration and expansion project). Dr. Alzarrad is a PMP©, CPEM©, and the Director of The Engineering Management Graduate Program at Marshall University.
To ensure learner engagement, the importance of integrating learners’ culture or, at the very least, being cognizant about it while carrying out formal/informal STEM activities has been well recognized in the STEM literature. However, the importance of considering learners’ political identity while designing such activities has not been well-addressed. The lack of scientific literacy coupled with the distrust that a wide range of people has with scientific efforts of any kind that go against their worldviews, values, and beliefs can potentially have a significant impact on STEM educational activities’ effectiveness. This research is grounded in the idea that both sociocultural and sociopolitical realities of learners’ lives and the interplay between those realities need to be exhaustively investigated to better communicate science via STEM activities. STEM activities should be designed that should guide people to discern among evidence, opinion, misinformation, and disinformation regardless of their cultural and political identities and develop STEM identities that can coexist with them. To this end, this research will address the following research questions: (1) what approaches STEM researchers and practitioners have traditionally adopted to include culture and politics into the learning process?, (2) what challenges have they experienced in advancing or promoting science with cultural and political resistance?, and (3) what new mechanisms can be adopted or existing mechanisms can be modified to address evolving challenges in the sociocultural and sociopolitical landscape?. With increasingly sophisticated tools and techniques available for conducting research syntheses, it is now possible to look at different research domains and find answers regarding the complex interplay of sociocultural and sociopolitical factors in STEM education. Multiple bodies of peer and field-reviewed literature will be consulted in this research using a mixed studies review approach. First, the research team will look at diverse theoretical traditions spanning psychology, political science, sociology, and anthropology, to understand how sociocultural and sociopolitical perspectives in the learning sciences have centered the role of identity in the learning process. Second, the research team will review formal and informal STEM-based peer-reviewed articles and white papers to understand how STEM practitioners addressed different sociocultural and sociopolitical challenges. Third, the research team will review different mechanisms available in the existing literature to debias people and how they can be adopted by STEM practitioners. The direct beneficiary of this research endeavor will be professional audiences who are (1) individuals or organizations working in designing and implementing formal/informal STEM activities, and (2) students, faculty, and researchers interested in formal/informal STEM outreach and citizen science focus. The broader impact of this research is that it can potentially provide a better understanding to the STEM community why marginalized populations such as the rural population or communities of color have historically demonstrated unique social, cultural, and political traits that are typically averse to science learning and acceptance and what needs to be done to alleviate such a pressing issue in the current era.
Chowdhury, S., & Alzarrad, A. (2023, March), Sociocultural and Sociopolitical Challenges for STEM Education in the Current Era Paper presented at 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference, Morgantown, West Virginia. 10.18260/1-2--44909
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015