Asee peer logo

The Capstone Engineering Systems Design Process At The United States Air Force Academy

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Managing and Funding Design Projects

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

7.1127.1 - 7.1127.10

DOI

10.18260/1-2--10823

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/10823

Download Count

412

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Timothy Lawrence

author page

Michael Warner

author page

Douglas Bayley

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu

Session 1302

The Capstone Engineering Systems Design Process at the United States Air Force Academy

Capt Doug Bayley, Maj Tim Lawrence, PhD., Capt Mike Warner, PhD. United States Air Force Academy

Abstract

This paper describes the overall experience of offering a capstone, senior-level, engineering systems design course at the United States Air Force Academy from the perspective of both technical and non-technical students, along with their instructors. The course is designed to introduce cadets o f all majors to the engineering design process and the Air Force acquisition process. The cadets are expected to apply knowledge from past courses at the United States Air Force Academy to design, build, test, and deliver a project that the instructor assigns to them, which benefits a real-world user. Along the way, the cadets also meet certain milestones, give briefings and demonstrations, and prepare technical reports. The course is geared so that technical and non -technical cadets can team up to perform meaningful work in an engineering design format. In the midst of a unique and often challenging group dynamics environment, the cadets are challenged to find their own solution to an ill-defined problem, and then actually perform hands on fabrication and testing of their project. Examples of past projects and the performance of cadets in building those projects will be evaluated to provide some insight into cadet performance. Data will be analyzed to determine whether cadet performance is tied to the technical complexity of a given project. Some insight into teaching this course is discussed, and finally, the paper will discuss the benefits and the challenges involved in a course like Engineering Systems Design. The paper will conclude with some feed back from recent graduates of the United Stated Air Force Academy and a look toward the future of the course.

Background

Every cadet graduates with a Bachelor of Science degree from the USAF Academy, whether majoring in science and engineering (technical majors) or the humanities and social science (non-technical majors.) As part of the curriculum, each cadet takes six engineering courses, from the civil, electrical, aeronautical, astronautical, and mechanical engineering departments. For the last 31 years, the USAF Academy has offered a capstone, senior-level, engineering systems design course to tie these courses together, known as Engineering 410 (Engr 410). Since its inception, Engr 410 has been a part of the core curriculum at the USAF Academy. The initial designers of the course felt that it

“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”

Main Menu

Lawrence, T., & Warner, M., & Bayley, D. (2002, June), The Capstone Engineering Systems Design Process At The United States Air Force Academy Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10823

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015