Martin, K. M., & Fernandez, T. M., & Mangum, R. (2021, July), Work in Progress: Examining Engineering Seniors Students’ Perception of Justice and Fairness of Grading Practices  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--38154

\bibitem{asee_peer_38154}
  Martin, K. M., \& Fernandez, T. M., \& Mangum, R. (2021, July), \emph{Work in Progress: Examining Engineering Seniors Students’ Perception of Justice and Fairness of Grading Practices}
  Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.
  10.18260/1-2--38154

Kaela M. Martin, Todd M. Fernandez, and Richard Mangum.  "Work in Progress: Examining Engineering Seniors Students’ Perception of Justice and Fairness of Grading Practices".  2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July.  ASEE Conferences, 2021.  https://strategy.asee.org/38154 Internet.  22 Jul, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_38154}
  Kaela M. Martin, Todd M. Fernandez, and Richard Mangum.
  "Work in Progress: Examining Engineering Seniors Students’ Perception of Justice and Fairness of Grading Practices".
  \emph{2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2021.
  https://strategy.asee.org/38154 Internet.  22 Jul, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_38154
author = "Kaela M. Martin, Todd M. Fernandez, and Richard Mangum"
title = "Work in Progress: Examining Engineering Seniors Students’ Perception of Justice and Fairness of Grading Practices"
booktitle = "2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2021"
month = "July"
address = "Virtual Conference"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://strategy.asee.org/38154}
number = {10.18260/1-2--38154}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - This work-in-progress paper reports preliminary results about engineering students’ perceptions of the justice and fairness in grading. The paper quantitatively compares students’ perceptions between a specifications graded and traditionally graded capstone class and analyzes qualitative comments about students’ overall perceptions of grading. Specifications grading is a system of assigning grades primarily characterized by grading each assignment as pass or no-pass (i.e., fail) and is proposed as a way to increase students’ learning, motivation, and autonomy while also modeling real (engineering) workplace practices. The results of this work in progress suggest a number of interesting findings primarily the difference between the quantitative and qualitative findings. The quantitative results suggest a positive perception of specification grading while the qualitative results suggest a more negative outlook. Future work is needed to better understand this difference.
AU  - Kaela M. Martin
AU  - Todd M. Fernandez
AU  - Richard Mangum
CY  - Virtual Conference
DA  - 2021/07/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Work in Progress: Examining Engineering Seniors Students’ Perception of Justice and Fairness of Grading Practices
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/38154
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--38154
ER  -