Work in Progress: Toward an Analytical Framework for
Inclusive and Marginalizing Talk Moves in Engineering Student Homework Groups

Tyrine Jamella Pangan; Kristen B Wendell

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Charting Inclusivity: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Technology in Engineering and Computing Education
Tagged Divisions: Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/48520

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Tyrine Jamella Pangan Tufts University

visit author page

Tyrine Jamella Pangan is a STEM Education PhD student at Tufts University and a Graduate Research Assistant at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO). She is interested in integrating social and emotional learning (SEL) in engineering, specifically within the elementary school context.

visit author page

biography

Kristen B Wendell Tufts University

visit author page

Dr. Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University, where she also holds a secondary appointment in the department of Education. She leads a research group at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) and is a member of the Tufts Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction (IRLI). Her research focuses on characterizing and supporting sophisticated disciplinary discourse practices during engineering learning experiences in undergraduate courses, K-8 classrooms, and teacher education contexts. Wendell previously taught at the University of Massachusetts Boston, and she holds a PhD in science education from Tufts and BS and MS degrees in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Princeton and MIT. More information can be found on the Wendell lab website: https://sites.google.com/view/wendell-lab/home.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Teamwork is a crucial component in engineering education due to the collaborative nature of the field (Cross and Cross, 1996). Although students are expected to work together, how they interact with each other can marginalize or center the role of certain team members. How team members encourage or discourage participation can heavily influence a student’s sense of belonging in the field, thereby influencing their opportunities to learn (Secules et al., 2018). This work-in-progress paper aims to characterize how different kinds of student discourse moves serve to influence the level of inclusion or marginalization in student teamwork at a moment-to-moment grain size. We are guided by the following research question: In what ways does engineering student talk communicate inclusion or exclusion of other students’ ideas?

Prior work has been done exploring marginalization in classroom groups such as looking into different forms of microaggression (Sue et al., 2007) and studying microinterventions consisting of inclusive moves (Cohen and Loten, 2014; Michaels and O’Connor, 2015). For this study, we use Hall et. al (1994)’s definition of marginalization as “the process through which persons are peripheralized on the basis of their identities, associations, experiences, and environments” (p. 25). To define inclusion in the engineering homework talk context, we are guided by Kittleson and Southerland (2004)’s definition for collaboration as “an active give-and-take of ideas between persons rather than one person’s passively learning from the other” (p. 268). This project focuses on undergraduate engineering class conversations, combining researchers’ qualitative discourse analysis of student talk transcripts.

The goal is to develop a new approach to detect marginalizing and inclusive talk within student engineering team discourse. Within the scope of this work-in-progress study, we looked at a subset of six discussion transcripts and used discourse analysis techniques (Brown et. Al., 1983) to dissect the transcripts for moves that had the potential to either include or marginalize other students. For future work, the authors wish to further explore two additional research questions: (1) Are there patterns of inclusive moves that cue a minimally participating student to share an idea? (2) Do conversations with more equal participation across students have different talk move patterns than less equal conversations?

Citation
Format

Pangan, T. J., & Wendell, K. B. (2024, June), Work in Progress: Toward an Analytical Framework for Inclusive and Marginalizing Talk Moves in Engineering Student Homework Groups Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/48520

TY - CPAPER
AB - Teamwork is a crucial component in engineering education due to the collaborative nature of the field (Cross and Cross, 1996). Although students are expected to work together, how they interact with each other can marginalize or center the role of certain team members. How team members encourage or discourage participation can heavily influence a student’s sense of belonging in the field, thereby influencing their opportunities to learn (Secules et al., 2018). This work-in-progress paper aims to characterize how different kinds of student discourse moves serve to influence the level of inclusion or marginalization in student teamwork at a moment-to-moment grain size. We are guided by the following research question: In what ways does engineering student talk communicate inclusion or exclusion of other students’ ideas?

Prior work has been done exploring marginalization in classroom groups such as looking into different forms of microaggression (Sue et al., 2007) and studying microinterventions consisting of inclusive moves (Cohen and Loten, 2014; Michaels and O’Connor, 2015). For this study, we use Hall et. al (1994)’s definition of marginalization as “the process through which persons are peripheralized on the basis of their identities, associations, experiences, and environments” (p. 25). To define inclusion in the engineering homework talk context, we are guided by Kittleson and Southerland (2004)’s definition for collaboration as “an active give-and-take of ideas between persons rather than one person’s passively learning from the other” (p. 268). This project focuses on undergraduate engineering class conversations, combining researchers’ qualitative discourse analysis of student talk transcripts.

The goal is to develop a new approach to detect marginalizing and inclusive talk within student engineering team discourse. Within the scope of this work-in-progress study, we looked at a subset of six discussion transcripts and used discourse analysis techniques (Brown et. Al., 1983) to dissect the transcripts for moves that had the potential to either include or marginalize other students. For future work, the authors wish to further explore two additional research questions: (1) Are there patterns of inclusive moves that cue a minimally participating student to share an idea? (2) Do conversations with more equal participation across students have different talk move patterns than less equal conversations?
AU - Tyrine Jamella Pangan
AU - Kristen B Wendell
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Work in Progress: Toward an Analytical Framework for
Inclusive and Marginalizing Talk Moves in Engineering Student Homework Groups
UR - https://peer.asee.org/48520
ER -