Hilliger, I., & Melian, C., & Meza, J., & Cortés, G., & Baier, J. A. (2020, June), Work in Progress: What Makes Courses Demanding in Engineering Education? A Combination of Mixed Methods and Grounded Theory Research  Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35704

\bibitem{asee_peer_35704}
  Hilliger, I., \& Melian, C., \& Meza, J., \& Cortés, G., \& Baier, J. A. (2020, June), \emph{Work in Progress: What Makes Courses Demanding in Engineering Education? A Combination of Mixed Methods and Grounded Theory Research}
  Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line .
  10.18260/1-2--35704

Isabel Hilliger P.E., Constanza Melian, Javiera Meza, Gonzalo Cortés, and Jorge A. Baier.  "Work in Progress: What Makes Courses Demanding in Engineering Education? A Combination of Mixed Methods and Grounded Theory Research".  2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line , 2020, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2020.  https://strategy.asee.org/35704 Internet.  30 Jun, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_35704}
  Isabel Hilliger P.E., Constanza Melian, Javiera Meza, Gonzalo Cortés, and Jorge A. Baier.
  "Work in Progress: What Makes Courses Demanding in Engineering Education? A Combination of Mixed Methods and Grounded Theory Research".
  \emph{2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line , 2020, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2020.
  https://strategy.asee.org/35704 Internet.  30 Jun, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_35704
author = "Isabel Hilliger P.E., Constanza Melian, Javiera Meza, Gonzalo Cortés, and Jorge A. Baier"
title = "Work in Progress: What Makes Courses Demanding in Engineering Education? A Combination of Mixed Methods and Grounded Theory Research"
booktitle = "2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2020"
month = "June"
address = "Virtual On line "
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://strategy.asee.org/35704}
number = {10.18260/1-2--35704}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Due to external influences, such as internationalization and technological changes, engineering curricula have incorporated an increasing number of contents and competencies. Future engineers have to demonstrate attainment of a broad range of abilities, such as complex problem-solving and entrepreneurial skills, and acquire a wide range of knowledge, such as scientific and mathematical principles. To achieve mastery of both abilities and knowledge, students are exposed to an increasing number of courses that they perceive as more demanding and rigorous when compared to previous versions. 

For understanding what students define as a demanding course, several researchers have explored the concept of academic workload. By workload, researchers have typically referred to the time students dedicate to a course both inside and outside the classroom. So far, there is a growing body of knowledge regarding factors that affect how students distribute time between course face-to-face activities and independent study, such as the type and schedule of course evaluations. However, little is known about the students' perception of the level of course difficulty and learning benefits in relation to the coverage of a wide range of knowledge and skills. In order to ensure that a wider number of content and skills translates into a greater learning experience, more studies are needed to understand not only the hours dedicated to particular courses, but also the difficulty and the level of learning attained as a consequence of the work done across the curriculum. 

This paper presents a Work-In-Progress (WIP) that is part of a large project to understand students’ perceptions on academic rigor at a large and selective school in Latin America. The research question addressed in this paper is: What factors affect students’ perceptions on demanding courses in terms of difficulty and learning? For answering this research question, we plan to combine the use of mixed methods with grounded theory research. This combination has already been used to generate theories about concepts that have not defined by the existing literature. In this study, mixed methods were used to collect qualitative and quantitative data from engineering students from different cohorts and disciplines. Qualitative data was collected from two focus groups with 13 students (26 students total), and quantitative data was collected from an online anonymous questionnaire applied to 1.154 students. Findings obtained from triangulation of quantitative and qualitative information show that the quantity and complexity of the content affects students’ perception of a greater difficulty, while students’ and teachers’ motivation  for the course contents affects students’ perception of greater learning. Future work will focus on defining a theory to explain why students’ perceive engineering courses as more demanding. 

AU  - Isabel Hilliger P.E.
AU  - Constanza Melian
AU  - Javiera Meza
AU  - Gonzalo Cortés
AU  - Jorge A. Baier
CY  - Virtual On line 
DA  - 2020/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Work in Progress: What Makes Courses Demanding in Engineering Education? A Combination of Mixed Methods and Grounded Theory Research
UR  - https://strategy.asee.org/35704
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--35704
ER  -