Reflecting on Adapting Visual-Oriented Classes for Blind and Low-Vision Students

Sourojit Ghosh; Kunal V Mehta; Maxwell Coppock; Sarah Marie Coppola

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Inclusive Dialogues and Adaptations in Engineering Education: Navigating Uncertainty and Leveraging AI for Student Success
Tagged Divisions: Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/47928

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Sourojit Ghosh University of Washington

visit author page

Sourojit Ghosh is a fourth year PhD Candidate at the University of Washington, Seattle in Human Centered Design and Engineering.

visit author page

author page

Kunal V Mehta University of Washington

biography

Maxwell Coppock University of Washington

visit author page

Maxwell is an HCI researcher and designer with a focus in accessibility. While attending the University of Washington, he worked for the Disability Resources for Students department to assist a blind engineering student as a reader and scribe.

visit author page

biography

Sarah Marie Coppola University of Washington

visit author page

Sarah Coppola is an Assistant Teaching Professor the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Dr. Coppola is an educator and researcher whose work focuses on how people are excluded by design. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, a MS in Human Factors Engineering from Tufts University, and a Doctorate in Ergonomics from Harvard University.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Engineering pedagogical content is often highly visual, consisting of formulae and diagrams shown in textbooks taught through lecture slides and writing on whiteboards. Such courses highly dependent on visual content presents a significant access barrier for students who are blind or low vision (BLV), and severely restricts their opportunities to equitably participate and be successful in class. While methods such as creating image descriptions for slides and using tactile graphics have been used in classrooms across other disciplines, they have limited efficacy in STEM classes, and specifically in engineering courses. These methods also have varying efficacy depending on the age at which the student lost vision and their own mental models and exposure to graphics. Additionally, even though the onus for creating their own access should not fall upon BLV students or those with other disabilities, there are very few tools available for BLV students to create their own diagrams or engineering designs in ways that are accessible to them.

In this paper, BLV students and sighted instructors will reflect on the experience of adapting two engineering courses to be more accessible to BLV students. The first course, a Master’s level User-Centered Design (MUCD) course, has traditionally been taught as a visual design class with weekly sketches, graphical depictions of design ideas, and a final project with visual artifacts, rendering it highly inaccessible to BLV students. The second course, a Bachelor’s and Master’s level Ergonomics and Biomechanics (BMEB) course, has many anatomy and physiology diagrams and utilizes complicated models and formulae, and is therefore similarly inaccessible as above.

This paper will present these two courses as case studies, demonstrating the adaptations made while reflecting on what was successful and what was unsuccessful. We will discuss pedagogical content such as tactile anatomy models, clay dough and arts/crafts, stencils and drawing tools, sighted assistance with sketching, screen reader accessible textbooks, and other adaptations utilized. We will provide recommendations for instructors of similar classes who need to adapt their classes.

Citation
Format

Ghosh, S., & Mehta, K. V., & Coppock, M., & Coppola, S. M. (2024, June), Reflecting on Adapting Visual-Oriented Classes for Blind and Low-Vision Students Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/47928

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Engineering pedagogical content is often highly visual, consisting of formulae and diagrams shown in textbooks taught through lecture slides and writing on whiteboards. Such courses highly dependent on visual content presents a significant access barrier for students who are blind or low vision (BLV), and severely restricts their opportunities to equitably participate and be successful in class. While methods such as creating image descriptions for slides and using tactile graphics have been used in classrooms across other disciplines, they have limited efficacy in STEM classes, and specifically in engineering courses. These methods also have varying efficacy depending on the age at which the student lost vision and their own mental models and exposure to graphics. Additionally, even though the onus for creating their own access should not fall upon BLV students or those with other disabilities, there are very few tools available for BLV students to create their own diagrams or engineering designs in ways that are accessible to them. 

In this paper, BLV students and sighted instructors will reflect on the experience of adapting two engineering courses to be more accessible to BLV students. The first course, a Master’s level User-Centered Design (MUCD) course, has traditionally been taught as a visual design class with weekly sketches, graphical depictions of design ideas, and a final project with visual artifacts, rendering it highly inaccessible to BLV students. The second course, a Bachelor’s and Master’s level Ergonomics and Biomechanics (BMEB) course, has many anatomy and physiology diagrams and utilizes complicated models and formulae, and is therefore similarly inaccessible as above. 

This paper will present these two courses as case studies, demonstrating the adaptations made while reflecting on what was successful and what was unsuccessful. We will discuss pedagogical content such as tactile anatomy models, clay dough and arts/crafts, stencils and drawing tools, sighted assistance with sketching, screen reader accessible textbooks, and other adaptations utilized. We will provide recommendations for instructors of similar classes who need to adapt their classes. 

AU  - Sourojit Ghosh
AU  - Kunal V Mehta
AU  - Maxwell Coppock
AU  - Sarah Marie Coppola
CY  - Portland, Oregon
DA  - 2024/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Reflecting on Adapting Visual-Oriented Classes for Blind and Low-Vision Students
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/47928
ER  -