Supporting Early Childhood Educators in Implementing and Adapting Research-based Engineering Activities Designed for Families (Fundamental, Diversity)

Gina Navoa Svarovsky; Catherine Wagner; Mia Lettau; Kimberly Marfo; Scott Pattison; Smirla Ramos-Montañez; Viviana López Burgos; Amy R Corbett; Maria D. Quijano; Diana Contreras

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Homer's Epiphany: Making STEM Elementary Woo-hoo!
Tagged Division: Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/48036

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Gina Navoa Svarovsky University of Notre Dame

visit author page

Gina Navoa Svarovsky is the Faculty Director of the Center for Broader Impacts (CBI) at the University of Notre Dame and an Associate Professor of the Practice at Notre Dame’s Center for STEM Education. For nearly two decades, she has been interested in how young people learn science and engineering in both formal and informal learning environments. Specifically, her research centers on exploring how youth and families from traditionally underrepresented populations in engineering are able to develop engineering interest, skills, knowledge, and ways of thinking as a result of engaging in authentic engineering activities within a wide range of learning contexts.

visit author page

biography

Catherine Wagner University of Notre Dame orcid.org/0009-0007-9036-2775

visit author page

Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering research. In the Center, she also supports other research projects on science pedagogy.

visit author page

author page

Scott Pattison, PhD, is a social scientist who has been studying and supporting STEM education and learning since 2003, as an educator, program and exhibit developer, evaluator, and researcher. His current work focuses on engagement, learning, and interest and identity development in free-choice and out-of-school environments, including museums, community-based organizations, and everyday settings. Dr. Pattison specializes in using qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate the processes and mechanisms of learning in naturalistic settings. He has partnered with numerous educational and community organizations across the country to support learning for diverse communities.

visit author page

author page

Smirla Ramos-Montañez

author page

Viviana López Burgos

author page

Amy R Corbett

author page

Maria D. Quijano

author page

Diana Contreras

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Exploring engineering activities with early learners has been an area of increasing focus for engineering educators over the past decade (English & Moore, 2018; NASEM, 2021). While a number of studies have explored various aspects of engineering within the preschool classroom, few have focused specifically on the professional development of early childhood educators (Brenneman et al., 2019; Eckhoff, 2021; McWayne et al., 2022), particularly when implementing new engineering curriculum materials or activities (Ata-Aturk & Demirican, 2021; Bagiati & Evangelou, 2015).

In this paper, we present a study exploring how early childhood educators adapt and implement three bilingual engineering activities - originally developed for family home use as part of a design-based research (DBR) study - within their own family-focused classrooms. Specifically, we seek to address the following research questions: 1) How do the early childhood educators use and modify DBR-developed activities for their own classroom contexts? 2) What professional development activities, approaches, and resources did the educators find most helpful in supporting their implementation of these engineering activities within their classrooms?

We present data from the year-long study, which included 19 participants from a community-based early childhood program that included weekly opportunities for parent-child interaction sessions. Three participants, also listed as authors on the paper, held administrative roles with the program and were part of the project leadership team along with four researchers. The remaining 16 participants were early childhood educators interfacing with families through the program. During the year, the four researchers delivered one in-person and two virtual professional development sessions, which typically focused on both advancing engineering understanding as well as introducing the DBR-developed engineering activities. After each session, a four- to six-week Implementation period followed, and the participants were asked to use and adapt the activities as much or as little as they desired. Surveys were collected at the end of each implementation period, and interviews were conducted at the end of the year. Site visits were also made to to observe implementation in several classrooms.

Survey responses indicate that nearly all of the early childhood educators in the program felt confident in using activities from the DBR research project in their classroom, indicating a wide range of approaches to integrating the activities within their existing classroom structures and activities. Common adaptations over the course of the year included adding supplementary materials to the standard activity kits and modifying elements of the design context that deepened engagement and relevance for families in their classrooms. Interviews with the educators suggested that they found the professional development sequence and programmatic supports (e.g., activity guides) effective, not only in empowering them to use the original activities from the DBR study, but also in brainstorming and creating their own engineering activities for their families. This work can make a number of contributions to the pre-college engineering education community, including advancing the field’s understanding of engineering activities within programs intended for early learners and their families, effective professional development in engineering for early childhood educators, and collaborative and equity-focused engineering education research approaches with community partners.

Citation
Format

Svarovsky, G. N., & Wagner, C., & Lettau, M., & Marfo, K., & Pattison, S., & Ramos-Montañez, S., & López Burgos, V., & Corbett, A. R., & Quijano, M. D., & Contreras, D. (2024, June), Supporting Early Childhood Educators in Implementing and Adapting Research-based Engineering Activities Designed for Families (Fundamental, Diversity) Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/48036

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Exploring engineering activities with early learners has been an area of increasing focus for engineering educators over the past decade (English &amp;amp; Moore, 2018; NASEM, 2021). While a number of studies have explored various aspects of engineering within the preschool classroom, few have focused specifically on the professional development of early childhood educators (Brenneman et al., 2019; Eckhoff, 2021; McWayne et al., 2022), particularly when implementing new engineering curriculum materials or activities (Ata-Aturk &amp;amp; Demirican, 2021; Bagiati &amp;amp; Evangelou, 2015).

In this paper, we present a study exploring how early childhood educators adapt and implement three bilingual engineering activities - originally developed for family home use as part of a design-based research (DBR) study - within their own family-focused classrooms. Specifically, we seek to address the following research questions: 1) How do the early childhood educators use and modify DBR-developed activities for their own classroom contexts? 2) What professional development activities, approaches, and resources did the educators find most helpful in supporting their implementation of these engineering activities within their classrooms?

We present data from the year-long study, which included 19 participants from a community-based early childhood program that included weekly opportunities for parent-child interaction sessions. Three participants, also listed as authors on the paper, held administrative roles with the program and were part of the project leadership team along with four researchers. The remaining 16 participants were early childhood educators interfacing with families through the program. During the year, the four researchers delivered one in-person and two virtual professional development sessions, which typically focused on both advancing engineering understanding as well as introducing the DBR-developed engineering activities. After each session, a four- to six-week Implementation period followed, and the participants were asked to use and adapt the activities as much or as little as they desired. Surveys were collected at the end of each implementation period, and interviews were conducted at the end of the year. Site visits were also made to to observe implementation in several classrooms.  

Survey responses indicate that nearly all of the early childhood educators in the program felt confident in using activities from the DBR research project in their classroom, indicating a wide range of approaches to integrating the activities within their existing classroom structures and activities. Common adaptations over the course of the year included adding supplementary materials to the standard activity kits and modifying elements of the design context that deepened engagement and relevance for families in their classrooms. Interviews with the educators suggested that they found the professional development sequence and programmatic supports (e.g., activity guides) effective, not only in empowering them to use the original activities from the DBR study, but also in brainstorming and creating their own engineering activities for their families. This work can make a number of contributions to the pre-college engineering education community, including advancing the field’s understanding of engineering activities within programs intended for early learners and their families, effective professional development in engineering for early childhood educators, and collaborative and equity-focused engineering education research approaches with community partners.
AU  - Gina Navoa Svarovsky
AU  - Catherine Wagner
AU  - Mia Lettau
AU  - Kimberly Marfo
AU  - Scott Pattison
AU  - Smirla Ramos-Montañez
AU  - Viviana López Burgos
AU  - Amy R Corbett
AU  - Maria D. Quijano
AU  - Diana Contreras
CY  - Portland, Oregon
DA  - 2024/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Supporting Early Childhood Educators in Implementing and Adapting Research-based Engineering Activities Designed for Families (Fundamental, Diversity)
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/48036
ER  -